RECORDING OF PROVING

 

DR. SUMIT GOEL M.D. (Hom)

www.homeopathyspace.com

 

 

            The recording of the proving is the most important aspect of the entire proving exercise; for it is on the experiences of the provers that the pure Homoeopathic Materia Medica is derived. Hence it is important that the observations of the prover have to be recorded in meticulous detail and in a systematic way, so as to ease the post-proving analysis of the records.

 

PROFORMA LAYOUT

·         INITIAL MEDICAL REPORT PROFORMA 

As it is practically impossible to find perfectly healthy human beings, the recording of the Initial Medical Report Proforma serves as the reference point for the inclusion or exclusion of the prover from the proving project. A detailed history taking, physical examination and necessary investigations can fairly judge the health status of the prover. The provers selected for proving are then subjected to a thorough preliminary medical examination. Laboratory investigations such as pathological, biochemical and radiological evaluation were carried out, if required. Detailed medical and personal history of the prover is recorded in this proforma by the proving supervisors. The ascertainable physical constitution, moral and intellectual character, occupation, mode of living and habits, social and domestic relations, sexual function, etc are to be taken into consideration. If necessary, services of specialist consultants are made use of. This proforma is also later analyzed with the proving records in the post-proving stage.

 

·         PROVER’S DAYBOOK / LOGBOOK

The prover’s daybook or the logbook is a properly designed format wherein the prover makes data entries in chronological order as per instructions. Provers should begin to take notes 7 days prior to taking the remedy. This helps them to get into the habit of observing themselves and recording symptoms, as well as bringing them in contact with their normal state. The prover, in a daybook, then enters the drug response data originating in the proving trials after the administration of the test drug.

 

·         RESPONSE MONITORING PROFORMA

Each prover is to be interrogated meticulously at each visit. The investigators monitor the responses of the prover in the Response Monitoring Proforma. Location, sensation, modalities, concomitants, extension, duration, etc. with regard to each sign and symptom; their intensity, sequence of their occurrence and recurrence is noted on the sheet. Time keeping is an important element of the proving. Weather, temperature and humidity are to be noted down daily during interrogation by the investigators. Laboratory investigations and services of specialist consultants may be made use of, if deemed necessary. The nature of monitoring of the prover’s response is analogous to the careful investigation of a case of disease to form the portrait of the disease.

 

RECORDING OF SYMPTOMS

Each prover is provided with a daybook to make a record of all the signs and symptoms, subjective and objective, they experience during the proving. Any alteration from the normal health should be recorded.

 

HOW TO NOTE  

·         Adherence to the protocol, honesty and sincerity are the prerequisites both on the part of investigators and the prover.

·         Recording should be done without pre-biased ideas about the outcome of the proving.

·         It is important for the quality and credibility of the proving that one should not discuss the nature of symptoms with other provers. Provers and supervisors should refrain from discussing symptoms or experiences they are going through with other provers or supervisors during the entire duration of the proving.

·         The recording should be done as vigilantly and frequently as possible so that the details will be fresh in memory. Also a note is to be made even if nothing happens.

·         The prover should preferably keep the daybook at all times. It is a good idea to keep paper pad and a pencil in order to note down the symptoms as and when they arise and later transfer and elaborate in the daybook.

·         Each day is started on a new page with the date and which day of the proving it is, noted at the top of each page. The day of the first dose is day one. Records are made on alternate lines, as this allows space to comment.

·         The prover should note in an accurate, precise and detailed manner the symptoms in one’s own language and not in the repertory language of rubrics. Accounts should be written in the first person.

·         In order to produce a proving of enduring value, the prover has to keep a daily diary of symptoms during the period that new symptoms are arising and for a minimum period of six weeks.

·         For provings of longer duration, the prover needs to be in daily communication or on alternate days, with assigned proving supervisor.

·         The Proving Supervisor must note down his observations chiefly from voluntary narration without asking any leading questions.

·         Symptoms have to be reviewed by prover and supervisor, investigated, clarified and recorded in detail. Supervisor should always seek to elicit any feelings and modalities that have been overlooked.

·         One should always discuss any queries with the supervisor.

 

WHAT TO NOTE

·         When beginning the proving, the prover needs to note down carefully any symptoms that arise, whether they are old or new and at what time of the day or night they occurred. The prover must note down distinctly the sensation, sufferings, accidents and changes of health he experiences at the time of their occurrence, mentioning the time after the ingestion of the drug.

·         Information about the time the symptoms appeared, the location, sensation, intensity, concomitant symptoms, extensions and modalities (such as weather, food and thirst) are especially important. This information should be recorded on the right hand page of the daybook.

·         The left hand page is devoted to recording the details and circumstances of the proving experiences in one’s own words. It is advisable for the prover , on a daily basis, to run a check through the different body zones to ensure that one has observed and recorded all symptoms.

·         Use of general terms such as, “daughter”, “son”, “place” is recommended, rather than proper names.

·         A record of occurrences is also to be maintained.

·         The attendants or the people about and around the prover are also a good source to remark on the changes in the prover and should be regularly considered.

·         Avoid mixing up symptoms that can be separated unless they link together, for instance, as concomitants do. If one can break symptom into discrete parts, this is helpful.

·         Dreams, fantasies, delusions and fears are the expressions of the response to the proving. These symptoms and dreams should be set within the context of the story, the dream events before and after, and the context of what may be best expressed as, the primary core of the dream.

·         The exact time of onset of symptoms, their chronological sequence, pattern of development, duration and whether symptoms are continuous or intermittent; onset slow or rapid.

·         The exact site of occurrence of the symptom, whether constant in location, or the radiation, of the symptom.

·         Careful noting of modalities that include factors of aggravation and amelioration as rest, movement, pressure, thermal, etc as well as the exact time of the day or night and its relationship to normal physiological functions.

·         Emotions, thought processes, impulses and cravings must be noted in detail, including those for certain foods.

·         Any modification of normal physiological functions as taste, touch, sight, appetite, thirst, sleep, digestion, sweating, discharges, sexuality, etc.

·         The possibility of any external causative factors, other than the proving remedy that could excite symptoms must be carefully recorded.

·         It is a good exercise to have a special note of the place characteristics and of the daily whether of the location of the prover.

·         On a daily basis, the prover should run through the entire check list to ensure that one has observed and recorded all symptoms.

 

Criteria for including symptoms:

·         New symptoms, unfamiliar to the prover, i.e., ones that have never experienced before,

·         Usual or current symptoms that are intensified to a marked degree.

·         Current symptoms that had been modified or altered (with clear description of current and modified components).

·         Old symptoms that have not occurred for at least one year (note time of last appearance).

·         Present symptoms that have disappeared during the proving (cure). 

·         If a symptom is in doubt, it is included in brackets. If another prover experienced the same symptom it could be valid. If not, it is excluded.

·         A symptom that may have been produced by a change in life or exciting cause should be excluded.

 

The Supervisor, in the presence of the prover should categorize each symptom by making a notation according to the following key in brackets next to each entry:

NS        : New symptom;

RS        : Return of a recent symptom;

OS       : Return of an old symptom;

AS        : An altered symptom i.e. a symptom that has changed its character, modality or concomitant;

CS        : A cured symptom i.e. one which has disappeared;

US        : An unusual symptom.

 

SUPERVISION PROCEDURES

1.       The prover is expected to remain in regular contact with the proving supervisor at all stages of the proving. The role of the supervisor serves two purposes. The first is to provide support for the prover, while the second is to ensure that the information gathered is as complete, detailed and accurate as possible. The role of the supervisor during this time is to clarify, verify and enlarge.

 

2.       The supervisor should record all information in a diary similar to that used by the prover – Response Monitoring Proforma – noting down location, sensation, modality, etc., and starting a new page each day with the current date, and writing legibly on alternate lines - this record will therefore follow the same format as the prover's diary. When recording symptoms, he should write down the prover's own words as fully as possible. Detailed information and concise legible recording is crucial to extracting the proving texts. Events may be triggered by the proving experience and should therefore be noted down.

 

3.       When the proving has finished, the prover and supervisor should meet and compare notes in order to eliminate any ambiguities or uncertainties. However, the Supervisor should not change the information in either diary, merely make a commentary about the nature of the discrepancies in a different coloured ink. The prover and the supervisor are also invited to write up a resume of their appraisal of the proven remedy's action.

 

INSTRUCTIONS TO PROVERS

Throughout the proving the prover needs to maintain contact with a supervisor.

 

Pre-Proving Stage

·         Protect the remedy until you have finished taking it. Keep the sealed bottle away from light, heat and strong smelling substances.

·         Ask the queries and clear the doubts completely before the onset of the proving. The supervisor will contact you before you begin the proving to take your case, answer any questions and to schedule a start and arrange contact times.

 

Onset of the Proving

·         Record your symptoms daily in the diary for one week prior to taking the remedy to get into the habit of observing and recording your symptoms, as well as bringing you in contact with your normal state.

 

Taking the Test Dose

·         Begin taking the remedy on the scheduled day. Record the time that you take each dose. Maintaining a Time Log is the most important aspect of the proving.

·         The remedy should be taken on a clean and fresh mouth.

·         Take the “coded test dose” for up to 3 doses daily for two days.

·         Symptoms appearing at the early stage are sometimes most useful, and anything you experience, no matter how subtle or unusual is to be recorded.

·         In the event that you experience symptoms or those around you observe any proving symptoms do not take any further doses of the remedy.

·         If in doubt contact the supervisor. Be on the safe side and do not take any further doses.

 

PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN BY PROVER DURING DRUG PROVING

·         The prover should avoid all substances that have any medicinal property, which should not be taken on the same day, nor yet neither on the subsequent days, nor during all the time we wish to observe the effects of the medicine, so that it may not interfere with the symptomatology.

·         Provers must be at least 3 months clear of any previous treatment or of a homeopathic remedy.

·         There should be a strict regulation of diet when the drug is being proved.

·         Any usage of restricted substances should be stopped 2 weeks prior to the beginning of the proving.

·         Diet during proving should be purely nutritious and of simple character.

·         Avoid all potential antidoting factors like tea, coffee, wine, brandy, camphor or mint during proving.

·         Overexertion of mind and body should be avoided. Provers should stick to their normal habits and way of life

·         All sorts of dissipation and disturbing passions should be avoided.

·         No drugs (medical or "pleasure", birth control pills, HRT etc.), no mental pathology (including long past pathological mental conditions, no chronic physical pathology (check for suppressions)

·         Provers should stick to their normal habits and way of life.

·         Remedy taking - dose repetition - up to 6 doses (3 a day).

·         Duration of supervision - the duration of supervision, particularly for those who clearly respond, should last a minimum of three months. They should also have a six month follow-up

·         There should be no urgent business to distract his attention.

·         Avoid any extraneous influences that may distort the results.

·         Should devote himself to careful self-observation and not be so disturbed whilst so engaged.

·         Hahnemann did not encourage even games or work activity that might disturb the concentration or judgement of the prover. Moderate exercises may be undertaken.

·         Should not be suffering from such chronic diseases as are liable to severe acute episodes (i.e. asthmatic attacks, psychotic episodes) or from degenerative chronic states; nor should be currently under either homoeopathic or allopathic treatment.

·         Refrain from inadvertently negating the remedy’s action by the use of drugs, remedies or other possibly antidoting substances.

 

Confidentiality

·         It is important for the quality and credibility of the proving that the prover discuss the symptoms only with the supervisor, and not with anyone else who is doing the proving or who has contact with someone who is.

·         Women should note when they have a period and any differences in any symptoms before, during or after.

·         Reports from friends and relatives can be very enlightening. Please include these if possible. At the end of the proving make a general summary of the proving. Note how the proving affected you in general. How has this experience affected your health?

 

Finishing the Proving

The supervision of proving is considered over, when there has been no change in the symptom picture for a month.

 

Reviewing the Information

On meeting the prover, supervisor shall compare and clarify the notes. The prover may add any further comments, thoughts or insights about the proving to the daybook. These daybooks, alongwith the Medical Report Proforma and the Response Monitoring Proforma are the sent to the compilation and analysis team, under the guidance of the Project Director. All the records are then decoded. This is followed by various stages of compiling and sorting the huge data. The provers may again be contacted in future for a “Follow up Evaluation”, to check for any residual symptoms of the proving, evaluating the state of health and to clear any doubts that may still be present.

A meeting of provers and supervisors may be arranged, where they are informed of the substance they had proved and for any other feedback.

 

 

 

 

DR. SUMIT GOEL M.D. (Hom)

www.homeopathyspace.com